A thing of beauty is a joy for ever:
Its loveliness increases; it will never
Pass into nothingness; but still will keep
A bower quiet for us, and a sleep
Full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing.
Aaaaaaahhh, Keats.
But, to be friends with me, you can't just say, "Yeah, you're right, those are pretty words." They have to mean something to you. Do they? Keats believes, as we all do, that something truly beautiful never really ends, but actually grows more beautiful, remaining in our memories to soothe us. That's why Wordsworth can look at Tintern Abbey one day and come back 5 years later to write about it.
Today in class we discussed Aristotle's Poetics, where he describes his beliefs of what tragedy, epic, history, comedy, poetry, and literature in general are. Aristotle says that the difference between the historian and the poet is: "the one tells of things that have been and the other of such things as might be. Poetry, therefore, is a more philosophical and a higher thing than history, in that poetry tends rather to express the universal, history rather the particular fact." We had quite an interesting debate about what the difference would be between a historical novel and a book of history. As we were discussing Aristotle's definitions of poetry and literature, I found myself thinking about the Romantics and their beliefs of what poetry is. Fundamentally, poetry is different from prose not only because of rhythm and rhyme and embellished language, but mostly because it looks deeper than facts and sees the causes of things. Poetry has to convey truth and bring pleasure, in order to be truly great, Wordsworth says, and Coleridge writes of the value of literature of power versus just plain old literature of knowledge. You can't have just one or the other. That's why I don't understand people who see no use or reason to read novels or poetry. They're missing something really big, I think.
So does that tie back to Keats' words about "a thing of beauty?" I don't know . . . you decide.
Its loveliness increases; it will never
Pass into nothingness; but still will keep
A bower quiet for us, and a sleep
Full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing.
Aaaaaaahhh, Keats.
But, to be friends with me, you can't just say, "Yeah, you're right, those are pretty words." They have to mean something to you. Do they? Keats believes, as we all do, that something truly beautiful never really ends, but actually grows more beautiful, remaining in our memories to soothe us. That's why Wordsworth can look at Tintern Abbey one day and come back 5 years later to write about it.
Today in class we discussed Aristotle's Poetics, where he describes his beliefs of what tragedy, epic, history, comedy, poetry, and literature in general are. Aristotle says that the difference between the historian and the poet is: "the one tells of things that have been and the other of such things as might be. Poetry, therefore, is a more philosophical and a higher thing than history, in that poetry tends rather to express the universal, history rather the particular fact." We had quite an interesting debate about what the difference would be between a historical novel and a book of history. As we were discussing Aristotle's definitions of poetry and literature, I found myself thinking about the Romantics and their beliefs of what poetry is. Fundamentally, poetry is different from prose not only because of rhythm and rhyme and embellished language, but mostly because it looks deeper than facts and sees the causes of things. Poetry has to convey truth and bring pleasure, in order to be truly great, Wordsworth says, and Coleridge writes of the value of literature of power versus just plain old literature of knowledge. You can't have just one or the other. That's why I don't understand people who see no use or reason to read novels or poetry. They're missing something really big, I think.
So does that tie back to Keats' words about "a thing of beauty?" I don't know . . . you decide.






